We are seeing, particularly in the retail market, a laundry list of prospective claims by tenants related to COVID-19 (casualty, condemnation, force majeure, impossibility, impracticability, etc.) coupled with demands for abatement of rent. I am happy to discuss these claims and defenses off-line, and there are some good materials coming from the usual suspects.
For my part, I remain hopeful that tenants, landlords and lenders will work together to mitigate losses, and hope that this group might share responses (or ideas) they see as particularly effective. I am seeing the following:
- Analysis of rent interruption and business interruption insurance policies. Viral outbreaks may be excluded from standard policies, but this should be confirmed before entering into abatement/deferral agreements.
- Review of past and current sales and financial statements to determine the scope of damages.
- Suspension of enforcement of continuous operations and related obligations.
- Consideration of rent deferral options with appropriate repayment plans (e.g., tacking time onto the end of the lease term so that the tenant is not hit with significant obligations when rebuilding after the crisis).
- Discussions with lenders about interest only periods and suspension of financial covenant enforcement while working with tenants to maintain continuity of operations.
I trust that this is the appropriate forum for discussion of cooperative and effective responses in landlord-tenant relations.
Tom Gates
Mirador Real Estate Advisors
Law Offices of Tilman Thomas Gates